From: | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH 2/2] lib/_emerge/resolver/output_helpers.py: explicitly state 'all satisfied' | ||
Date: | Wed, 06 Oct 2021 18:05:56 | ||
Message-Id: | pan$81d2f$ad169c8$2b25eda9$6bcf259@cox.net | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 2/2] lib/_emerge/resolver/output_helpers.py: explicitly state 'all satisfied' by Sam James |
1 | Sam James posted on Sat, 2 Oct 2021 21:11:56 +0100 as excerpted: |
2 | |
3 | > This makes things a bit less confusing and tries to avoid users focusing |
4 | > on (soft) blocks which aren't actually the problem they're hitting. |
5 | |
6 | I was pleasantly surprised by that "all satisfied" earlier today. |
7 | Thanks. I could get my brain around the old format but this is /so/ much |
8 | nicer! =:^) |
9 | |
10 | -- |
11 | Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
12 | "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
13 | and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 2/2] lib/_emerge/resolver/output_helpers.py: explicitly state 'all satisfied' | Sam James <sam@g.o> |