Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Sam James <sam@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Sam James <sam@g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 2/2] lib/_emerge/resolver/output_helpers.py: explicitly state 'all satisfied'
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2021 20:12:10
Message-Id: 20211002201156.346719-2-sam@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/2] lib/_emerge/resolver/output.py: say 'soft blocking' explicitly by Sam James
1 This makes things a bit less confusing and tries to avoid
2 users focusing on (soft) blocks which aren't actually
3 the problem they're hitting.
4
5 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@g.o>
6 ---
7 lib/_emerge/resolver/output_helpers.py | 2 ++
8 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
9
10 diff --git a/lib/_emerge/resolver/output_helpers.py b/lib/_emerge/resolver/output_helpers.py
11 index f80b79ccf..6ce812189 100644
12 --- a/lib/_emerge/resolver/output_helpers.py
13 +++ b/lib/_emerge/resolver/output_helpers.py
14 @@ -163,6 +163,8 @@ class _PackageCounters:
15 myoutput.append(
16 bad(" (%s unsatisfied)") % (self.blocks - self.blocks_satisfied)
17 )
18 + else:
19 + myoutput.append(" (all satisfied)")
20 return "".join(myoutput)
21
22
23 --
24 2.33.0

Replies