| 1 |
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:04:20 +0000 |
| 2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:31:25 +0100 Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> |
| 5 |
> wrote: |
| 6 |
> | Right now 'emerge action' and 'emerge --action' are both supported. |
| 7 |
> | But as we learned with the rsync case 'emerge action' has potential |
| 8 |
> | namespace conflicts with 'emerge package' I'd propose to deprecate |
| 9 |
> | 'emerge action' before we hit another real conflict. |
| 10 |
> | (The alternative would be to deprecate 'emerge package' in favor of |
| 11 |
> a | to-be-written 'emerge install <package>', but that's even more |
| 12 |
> | problematic) |
| 13 |
> | Technically it's a no-brainer, only potential problem would be user |
| 14 |
> | confusion. |
| 15 |
> | Any objections against this for pre5? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Mmm, is this taking advantage of Daniel no longer being able to revert |
| 18 |
> it? :) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Heh, almost forgot why the code has been commented for ages ;) |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Marius |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 28 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
Archives