| 1 |
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:31:25 +0100 Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> |
| 2 |
wrote: |
| 3 |
| Right now 'emerge action' and 'emerge --action' are both supported. |
| 4 |
| But as we learned with the rsync case 'emerge action' has potential |
| 5 |
| namespace conflicts with 'emerge package' I'd propose to deprecate |
| 6 |
| 'emerge action' before we hit another real conflict. |
| 7 |
| (The alternative would be to deprecate 'emerge package' in favor of a |
| 8 |
| to-be-written 'emerge install <package>', but that's even more |
| 9 |
| problematic) |
| 10 |
| Technically it's a no-brainer, only potential problem would be user |
| 11 |
| confusion. |
| 12 |
| Any objections against this for pre5? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Mmm, is this taking advantage of Daniel no longer being able to revert |
| 15 |
it? :) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
About time. This one's still one of the major sources of end user |
| 18 |
confusion. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Wearer of the shiny hat) |
| 22 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 23 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives