Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Ed Grimm <paranoid@××××××××××××××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Conary - dispatch-conf
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:57:48
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.58.0410272140460.21079@ybec.rq.iarg
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Conary - dispatch-conf by LinuxGuy@Cox.net
1 On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 LinuxGuy@×××.net wrote:
2
3 > Hi there, i've been putting in alot of work on dispatch-conf lately,
4 > adding features i personally need, and features that it should have. I
5 > have a new version of dispatch-conf posted at bug:
6 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68618
7 >
8 > i believe it will solve one of your major problems with dispatch-conf as
9 > i have added a new option called "config file freezing" which allows you
10 > to specify config files you never want to be overwritten, like
11 > /etc/fstab /etc/password and /etc/group and so on. instead it will take
12 > the new files that portage tries to pass out and apply them to rcs (or
13 > archive them through whatever meathod you are using). I'm also taking
14 > suggestions on features to be added, so if you, or anyone else feels
15 > there are other features that should be added email me about it and
16 > we'll talk about what/how should be added.
17
18 This does sound promising. Note that I cannot fathom any reason why I'd
19 want Gentoo's suggested updates archived into RCS for frozen files,
20 unless they were not placed on the main branch - I use RCS to track my
21 own changes, and I don't appreciate <censored>.
22
23 Ed
24
25 --
26 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Conary - dispatch-conf LinuxGuy@×××.net