Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: LinuxGuy@×××.net
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Conary - dispatch-conf
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 17:16:52
Message-Id: 20041028171811.GA2414@monolith.uml.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Conary - dispatch-conf by Ed Grimm
1 On 21:55 Wed 27 Oct , Ed Grimm wrote:
2 > On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 LinuxGuy@×××.net wrote:
3 >
4 > > Hi there, i've been putting in alot of work on dispatch-conf lately,
5 > > adding features i personally need, and features that it should have. I
6 > > have a new version of dispatch-conf posted at bug:
7 > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68618
8 > >
9 > > i believe it will solve one of your major problems with dispatch-conf as
10 > > i have added a new option called "config file freezing" which allows you
11 > > to specify config files you never want to be overwritten, like
12 > > /etc/fstab /etc/password and /etc/group and so on. instead it will take
13 > > the new files that portage tries to pass out and apply them to rcs (or
14 > > archive them through whatever meathod you are using). I'm also taking
15 > > suggestions on features to be added, so if you, or anyone else feels
16 > > there are other features that should be added email me about it and
17 > > we'll talk about what/how should be added.
18 >
19 > This does sound promising. Note that I cannot fathom any reason why I'd
20 > want Gentoo's suggested updates archived into RCS for frozen files,
21 > unless they were not placed on the main branch - I use RCS to track my
22 > own changes, and I don't appreciate <censored>.
23 >
24 > Ed
25 >
26
27 A good point i suppose, my reasoning for adding the new files to rcs was
28 in case there were important changes in the new gentoo files that you
29 needed, though i suppose those files can be grabbed by recompiling,
30 however if it's a large app that can be a bit of a hassle. perhaps the
31 new configs for frozen files should be added to a different archive? or
32 perhaps to another file? filefoo_frozen or something? i'd like to hear
33 what others think about the issue.
34
35 also, several new features have been added as well, all command line
36 options. -c for "clobberall" which will overwrite all config files that
37 are not frozen without asking you anything. -p for "pretend" which will
38 display all files to be updated (with purdy colors {trying to mimic the
39 merge look}, frozen in blue, others in green). -a for "ask", like emerge
40 ask, and -f for "force" which will force all files to update even if
41 frozen.
42
43 more detailed explainations, along with the file for your testing
44 enjoyment are here:
45 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68618
46
47 another feature i was thinking of adding was a simple command line based
48 way to add/subtract frozen files, like euse -E and -D. anything think
49 this is a good or bad idea?
50
51 lastly, Ed, i was a little confused by your last statment:
52 and I don't appreciate <censored>.
53 i can't think of a swear that fits here, should i be offended? or was it
54 just a joke? either way, i missed it. oh well.
55
56 i appreciate any feedback on this so i can continue to improve
57 dispatch-conf
58
59
60 --
61 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Conary - dispatch-conf Ed Grimm <paranoid@××××××××××××××××××××××.org>