| 1 |
On Mar 10, 2006, at 10:01 PM, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Saturday 11 March 2006 06:48, Kito wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> On Mar 10, 2006, at 4:26 AM, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 8 |
>>> Hash: SHA1 |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>>> Hello, |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>>> What do people think about moving PORTAGE_INST_UID and |
| 13 |
>>> PORTAGE_INST_GID to make.globals? |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> Would the profiles not be a more logical place to set these? If not, |
| 16 |
>> can we twist the logic to make it so? :p |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> The profiles would be able to override it. In the case of non- |
| 19 |
> incrementals |
| 20 |
> the first definition found is the winner in the order of: |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> env -> make.conf -> make.defaults (profile) -> make.globals |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
err, right..should've known that. Thanks for answering a silly question. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
--Kito |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives