Archives
Archives
| From: | Zac Medico <zmedico@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Bugzilla Bug 112779: New and Improved Way to Handle /etc/portage | ||
| Date: | Thu, 17 Nov 2005 07:13:50 | ||
| Message-Id: | 437C2D6C.2000602@gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-portage-dev] Bugzilla Bug 112779: New and Improved Way to Handle /etc/portage by capitalista |
||
| 1 | capitalista wrote: |
| 2 | > zmedico requested that I let you guys know about this idea via the |
| 3 | > mailing list, so here you go. Feel free to check it out at |
| 4 | > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112779. |
| 5 | > |
| 6 | |
| 7 | So, basically, you want to have multiple directories that the "traditional" /etc/portage inherits from. This would provide a way to separate local profile settings into groups and organize them (more effectively than the current use of commented blocks allows). |
| 8 | |
| 9 | I wouldn't mind having a feature like this. I would provide a way for automatic unmasking tools to keep their changes separate and easily reversible. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Zac |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Bugzilla Bug 112779: New and Improved Way to Handle /etc/portage | Anthony Gorecki <agorecki@××××××××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Bugzilla Bug 112779: New and Improved Way to Handle /etc/portage | Jean-Francois Gagnon Laporte <kioshen@×××××.com> |