| 1 |
On 03/14/2016 03:26 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: |
| 2 |
> I can't say much more than "ACK, probably makes sense" really. But |
| 3 |
> please test this *a lot* before merging it. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Thanks. I'll test it a lot. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> Regarding the merging of this patch, and th egencache patch that has |
| 8 |
> already been released: I thought we agreed that .29 should be *only* |
| 9 |
> the repoman merger, and then bug fixes go into a .30 where we try to |
| 10 |
> get a stable release with the new repoman. Why was egencache merged |
| 11 |
> anyway? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Sorry, I didn't really comprehend the necessity of excluding everything |
| 14 |
besides the new repoman changes. The egencache patch has no overlap with |
| 15 |
repoman the branch, so I didn't see any harm. I'll hold of on merging |
| 16 |
anything more. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> Should we not merge repoman to stable ASAP before doing |
| 19 |
> anything else? That would make .29 easier. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
That works for me. |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Thanks, |
| 24 |
Zac |
Archives