| 1 |
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 03:07, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 |
> Zac Medico has graciously done a pre5 release of the 2.1 tree and placed |
| 3 |
> it in his dev space and on the mirrors. The ebuild is not currently in |
| 4 |
> the portage tree, but please feel free to test it prior to it's actual |
| 5 |
> release. The intent here is to hopefully catch any show stopping bug |
| 6 |
> prior to it's 'actual' release. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> It is my estimation that a lot more users are running ~arch portage due |
| 9 |
> to cache issues as well as added features ( confcache, parallel-fetch, |
| 10 |
> etc ). |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> The ebuild is at [1]. |
| 13 |
> The tarball should be on the distfiles shortly, but if not the ebuild |
| 14 |
> will fetch from Zac's devspace. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Your testing is appreciated. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> [1]http://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/overlay/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.1_pre5 |
| 19 |
>.ebuild |
| 20 |
Hi, |
| 21 |
The install went w/o errors, but there's a problem afterwards. |
| 22 |
Before ever seeing 2.1-pre5 had an error (confcache) using 2.1-pre4, patched |
| 23 |
with 'confcache-final' + 'atomic-write' patches & using FEATURES=confcache. |
| 24 |
Same with 2.1_pre5 (fcron-3.0.1). |
| 25 |
After disabling '...confcache...' in /etc/make.conf fcron-3.0.1 compiles OK. |
| 26 |
Should i file a Bug as i don't want to pollute the ML with error logs. |
| 27 |
Thanks for your work.Rumen |
Archives