1 |
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:24:02 +0900 |
2 |
Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Monday 14 November 2005 00:46, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
5 |
> > On Sunday 13 November 2005 11:52, Brian Harring wrote: |
6 |
> > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 09:19:55AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
7 |
> > > > On Sunday 13 November 2005 04:00, Brian Harring wrote: |
8 |
> > > > > *cough* that's that funky _p1 you're using there? :) |
9 |
> > > > |
10 |
> > > > patchlevel... I think it gives a stronger impression that |
11 |
> > > > 2.0.53 is distinct from 2.0.54. Is distinct the right word? I |
12 |
> > > > mean that it kind of shows that 2.0.53 is done but there was |
13 |
> > > > something that needed to be fixed quickly. |
14 |
> > > |
15 |
> > > 2.0.53.1 vs 2.0.53_p1 vs 2.0.53.p1 ... either of the three |
16 |
> > > indicates 2.0.53 had minor fix tagged onto the base 2.0.53 |
17 |
> > > release... |
18 |
> > > |
19 |
> > > > Given |
20 |
> > > > portage's history of using lots of dots, 2.0.53.1 doesn't have |
21 |
> > > > as much impact. Is the "*cough*" a complaint of sorts? |
22 |
> > > |
23 |
> > > Well, knowing what you mean by pN, I'm just going to gesture |
24 |
> > > wildly at my earlier email of "lets fix the whacked out |
25 |
> > > versioning now". ;) |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > So then my suggested 2.0.53_p1 should be 2.0.54 and what is |
28 |
> > currently referred to as 2.0.54 should be 2.1.0? |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Any thoughts on this? If we use 2.0.54 for the fix for this, that can |
31 |
> go into ~arch before 2.0.53_pre7 goes to .53 and arch without |
32 |
> versioning getting screwed up. I'm still pretty sure 2.0.53 will be |
33 |
> stable (at least on some arch) in under 48 hours and the fix for this |
34 |
> should really go out at the same time or before... |
35 |
|
36 |
Replace 2.1.0 with 2.2.0 and I'll agree. |
37 |
|
38 |
Marius |
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
42 |
|
43 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
44 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |