Archives
Archives
| From: | Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] going to need a 2.0.53-rc8 | ||
| Date: | Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:43:32 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20051114154256.GA13219@nightcrawler | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] going to need a 2.0.53-rc8 by Marius Mauch |
||
| 1 | On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 04:32:35PM +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 2 | > > On Monday 14 November 2005 00:46, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 3 | > Replace 2.1.0 with 2.2.0 and I'll agree. |
| 4 | Skipping 2.1 accomplishes what? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | People asking, "whoah there, it's a later version then 2.1, where's |
| 7 | the 2.1 functionality?" will still occur. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | *cough* this is why alpha/feature releases should be date tagged |
| 10 | against the branch point instead of the potential version. :) |
| 11 | ~harring |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] going to need a 2.0.53-rc8 | Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> |