| 1 |
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005 09:42:56 -0600 |
| 2 |
Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2005 at 04:32:35PM +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > On Monday 14 November 2005 00:46, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 6 |
> > Replace 2.1.0 with 2.2.0 and I'll agree. |
| 7 |
> Skipping 2.1 accomplishes what? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Avoid any possible confusion about what 2.1 is. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> People asking, "whoah there, it's a later version then 2.1, where's |
| 12 |
> the 2.1 functionality?" will still occur. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I don't think so. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> *cough* this is why alpha/feature releases should be date tagged |
| 17 |
> against the branch point instead of the potential version. :) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
sorry, I don't understand this sentence. How would you have named the |
| 20 |
alpha snapshot? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Marius |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 28 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
Archives