| 1 |
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:37:43AM +0300, Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 2 |
> Brian Harring wrote: |
| 3 |
> >On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 06:52:24PM -0500, Mikey wrote: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> >>http://codeserver.wherever.net/pman/package_ids.php?action=package&id=10105 |
| 6 |
> >> |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> >[snip bits about wget screwing up] |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> >Others have already clarified that's it python side rather then bash |
| 11 |
> >so eclass is no go, but out of curiousity any got a good reason we |
| 12 |
> >can't modify FETCHCOMMAND to include FILE rather then just DISTDIR? |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> >With wget, it's just -O. Curl, piping probably (although haven't |
| 15 |
> >looked at their opts)... |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Where do you get the filename from if not SRC_URI? |
| 18 |
Additional metadata tagged in, or mangling of the syntax in some way. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Kind of a moot question if we can't extend FETCHCOMMAND/RESUMECOMMAND |
| 21 |
for it though, hence the question about if any fetchers will seriously |
| 22 |
choke on this requirement. |
| 23 |
~harring |
Archives