| 1 |
Zac Medico posted <443A2461.1010609@g.o>, excerpted below, on Mon, |
| 2 |
10 Apr 2006 02:24:49 -0700: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> What do people think about adding userpriv and usersandox to make.globals |
| 5 |
> FEATURES? I've been using these for a long time and haven't had any |
| 6 |
> trouble with them. Are there any arguments against making them default? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
I've had very occasional problems, but no more than with the default |
| 9 |
sandbox on its own. I'd say go for it, as I appreciate the slightly |
| 10 |
better security, and it shouldn't cause many issues beyond what's already |
| 11 |
there. For the few it may, better to catch and fix them anyway! |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 15 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 16 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in |
| 17 |
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives