1 |
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:19:58 -0400 |
2 |
Alec Warner <warnera6@×××××××.edu> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> I had a wiki that attempted to cover portage-2.0 api documentation as |
5 |
> well as anything written for 2.1 but lost much of the work in a |
6 |
> transition from windows to linux ( I screwed up the SQl backups :) ). |
7 |
> I thought about putting something up on the devwiki but I haven't |
8 |
> proposed anything because no one really likes a wiki for API docs. |
9 |
|
10 |
Yeah. A wiki isn't the best way, but better than nothing. |
11 |
Probably writing a documentation based on the XML Guide format Gentoo |
12 |
is using is a good start. |
13 |
|
14 |
> As for API docs, there are none at present; and there are no plans |
15 |
> for any stable docs, IIRC. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> As for a developer website, what kinds of information are you looking |
18 |
> for? |
19 |
|
20 |
All information I want is on the page [1], but the mentioned API |
21 |
documentation would help other people to find easy access to |
22 |
portage-development. |
23 |
This is the only improvement a "new" portage site needs in my opinion, |
24 |
since writing something like this needs a good knowledge of Python, |
25 |
easily asking someone to volunteer for it isn't good. :) |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
Chris |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
[1] http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/portage/index.xml |