| 1 |
Christopher Korn wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>>>Hi Jason and other folks, |
| 4 |
>>>I saw your last comment on |
| 5 |
>>>http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=73350 about most the these |
| 6 |
>>>feature to be present in the next major version. That is really |
| 7 |
>>>great to read. |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>>On that subject, I'd like to have an idea about when we should |
| 10 |
>>>expect that next version. |
| 11 |
>>> |
| 12 |
>>>That said, I think it would be helpful to have a portage developper |
| 13 |
>>>site. Perhaps there is and I dont know... |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>> That would require someone writing one, so if you are |
| 17 |
>>volunteering ;) |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
>Writing is not the problem. But without (proper) information it is hard |
| 23 |
>to write a documentation or something like this. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
>Chris |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
I had a wiki that attempted to cover portage-2.0 api documentation as |
| 30 |
well as anything written for 2.1 but lost much of the work in a |
| 31 |
transition from windows to linux ( I screwed up the SQl backups :) ). |
| 32 |
I thought about putting something up on the devwiki but I haven't |
| 33 |
proposed anything because no one really likes a wiki for API docs. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
As for API docs, there are none at present; and there are no plans for |
| 36 |
any stable docs, IIRC. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
As for a developer website, what kinds of information are you looking for? |
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives