Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] eapply: Output verbosely only if patch fails to apply with -F0
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 22:49:19
Message-Id: w6g8so1exzx.fsf@kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] eapply: Output verbosely only if patch fails to apply with -F0 by Michael Orlitzky
1 >>>>> On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
2
3 > This now disagrees with the PMS algorithm, doesn't it?
4
5 The difference is that there is now a QA warning for something that is
6 perfectly within the spec. Maybe the extra verboseness would be enough,
7 but the eqawarn line should be omitted? It doesn't provide any info that
8 isn't already present in the output of patch itself.
9
10 Ulrich

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies