From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> | ||
Cc: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] eapply: Output verbosely only if patch fails to apply with -F0 | ||
Date: | Wed, 27 Nov 2019 22:49:19 | ||
Message-Id: | w6g8so1exzx.fsf@kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] eapply: Output verbosely only if patch fails to apply with -F0 by Michael Orlitzky |
1 | >>>>> On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > This now disagrees with the PMS algorithm, doesn't it? |
4 | |
5 | The difference is that there is now a QA warning for something that is |
6 | perfectly within the spec. Maybe the extra verboseness would be enough, |
7 | but the eqawarn line should be omitted? It doesn't provide any info that |
8 | isn't already present in the output of patch itself. |
9 | |
10 | Ulrich |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] eapply: Output verbosely only if patch fails to apply with -F0 | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |