Archives
Archives
| From: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o, Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] eapply: Output verbosely only if patch fails to apply with -F0 | ||
| Date: | Thu, 28 Nov 2019 04:14:17 | ||
| Message-Id: | 02ec3d562967bac6fc023dbada12ff293d1aa41a.camel@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] eapply: Output verbosely only if patch fails to apply with -F0 by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 23:49 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 | > > > > > > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 3 | > > This now disagrees with the PMS algorithm, doesn't it? |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > The difference is that there is now a QA warning for something that is |
| 6 | > perfectly within the spec. Maybe the extra verboseness would be enough, |
| 7 | > but the eqawarn line should be omitted? It doesn't provide any info that |
| 8 | > isn't already present in the output of patch itself. |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | |
| 11 | It helps people understand why some patches throw a wall of text while |
| 12 | others don't. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | Best regards, |
| 16 | Michał Górny |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] eapply: Output verbosely only if patch fails to apply with -F0 | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] eapply: Output verbosely only if patch fails to apply with -F0 | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> |