| 1 |
On 05/10/2015 01:08 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 11:45 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 05/10/2015 04:47 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> However, there may be a another bug in here. Portage is complaining over not being able |
| 5 |
>>> to load the hosts profile as the hosts is using "profile-formats = portage-2" and my |
| 6 |
>>> CONFIGROOT is not. I don't think my CONFIGROOT should be forced to use "profile-formats = portage-2" |
| 7 |
>>> just because the host is? |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> It sounds like your profile must by using some feature that is not |
| 10 |
>> supported with the default profile format. Otherwise, why would you |
| 11 |
>> receive an error? These kinds of errors are only triggered when |
| 12 |
>> something about the profile is not supported by the default profile format. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Yes I do use portage-2 features in my host, I thought this was clear? |
| 15 |
> Now in my CONFIGROOT I am not and the point I trying to make is that my |
| 16 |
> CONFIGROOT should not have to worry about what profile format the host is using. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I don't recall a bug like that being filed yet. Could you please file |
| 19 |
one at bugs.gentoo.org? |
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Thanks, |
| 22 |
Zac |
Archives