1 |
On Sun, 2015-05-10 at 11:45 -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
2 |
> On 05/10/2015 04:47 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: |
3 |
> > However, there may be a another bug in here. Portage is complaining over not being able |
4 |
> > to load the hosts profile as the hosts is using "profile-formats = portage-2" and my |
5 |
> > CONFIGROOT is not. I don't think my CONFIGROOT should be forced to use "profile-formats = portage-2" |
6 |
> > just because the host is? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> It sounds like your profile must by using some feature that is not |
9 |
> supported with the default profile format. Otherwise, why would you |
10 |
> receive an error? These kinds of errors are only triggered when |
11 |
> something about the profile is not supported by the default profile format. |
12 |
|
13 |
Yes I do use portage-2 features in my host, I thought this was clear? |
14 |
Now in my CONFIGROOT I am not and the point I trying to make is that my |
15 |
CONFIGROOT should not have to worry about what profile format the host is using. |
16 |
|
17 |
Jocke |