| 1 |
Ok, |
| 2 |
Well, what if instead we were to try and treat the overlay trees as |
| 3 |
exactly that, overlays. So the moves were used from the lowest layer |
| 4 |
(ie the main tree) unless a higher up layer overrode them, could that |
| 5 |
work? It would mean effectively that the overlay moves were global, but |
| 6 |
I guess you'd then end up losing updates to the main tree if a file like |
| 7 |
4Q-2005 was overridden... |
| 8 |
Can anyone think of a pratical solution to this problem other than |
| 9 |
either a major rework of portage's tree handling system, or by having |
| 10 |
the two packages block each other and relying on the user to fix the |
| 11 |
tree up manually whenever this happens? Any ideas would be welcome, |
| 12 |
it's a problem I'd really like to fix. Thanks very much, |
| 13 |
Mike 5:) |
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives