Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] going to need a 2.0.53-rc8
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 23:15:28
Message-Id: 20051111231445.GD6165@nightcrawler
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] going to need a 2.0.53-rc8 by Brian Harring
1 Addendum...
2
3 On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 05:06:15PM -0600, Brian Harring wrote:
4 > > My preference would be to put the patch into trunk and release .54_pre1 within
5 > > the next 24 hours.
6 >
7 > Releasing .54 == releasing cache, pre/post patch. Yes getting those
8 > out for users to use is good, but see my earlier comments about
9 > sliding bug fixes in with large features.
10 >
11 > .53.1 strikes me as a better route; we're tagging for a reason, not too
12 > hard to pop back and make the change.
13
14 Might be worth noting that as of my last sync, .53* and friends are
15 *still* ~arch. I'd personally integrate the fix into .51.22 and .53,
16 releasing fixed versions of both (iow I'll do the legwork).
17
18 My two cents at least.
19 ~harring

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] going to need a 2.0.53-rc8 Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>