| 1 |
On Saturday 12 November 2005 08:14, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
> Might be worth noting that as of my last sync, .53* and friends are |
| 3 |
> *still* ~arch. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Yep, waiting on approval from the arch teams before going stable. I'll be |
| 6 |
posting a notification here when it happens as well. While waiting on the |
| 7 |
arch teams has extended the ~arch time of .53_preX, they've also exposed |
| 8 |
regressions that wouldn't have been picked up otherwise. Other than |
| 9 |
documentation concerns, they seem happy with .53 as it stands and I really |
| 10 |
don't want to jeopardize (that's a weird lookin' word) that. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
How's this for a compromise? Release the current 2.0.53 into stable so that |
| 13 |
2.0.51.22-r3 can be dropped out of the picture altogether. Then release a |
| 14 |
2.0.53.1 into ~arch with the lib handling fix so that we can get some |
| 15 |
guaranteed testing time of the patch. In a table: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
2.0.53 arch |
| 18 |
2.0.53_p1 ~arch |
| 19 |
2.0.54_pre1 package.mask |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
After a couple of weeks, move 2.0.53_p1 to stable and drop 2.0.53. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Jason Stubbs |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives