Archives
Archives
| From: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage docbook documentation -> why not asciidoc ? | ||
| Date: | Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:04:50 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4CF0209E.4080001@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage docbook documentation -> why not asciidoc ? by Lionel Orry |
||
| 1 | On 11/26/2010 12:37 PM, Lionel Orry wrote: |
| 2 | > The fact is, asciidoc does generate native docbook output. The result |
| 3 | > I gave was made using docbook-xsl-stylesheets and a css file. So you |
| 4 | > wouldn't loose the docbook flexibility then... |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Hmm, do it's like an extra translation layer on top of docbook? For ease |
| 7 | in reading/editing, I think that I'd prefer to use some type of |
| 8 | automated editing tool that to add an additional layer of markup. |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | Thanks, |
| 11 | Zac |