Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Lionel Orry <lionel.orry@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage docbook documentation -> why not asciidoc ?
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 07:41:09
Message-Id: AANLkTimjyf5T5NOD3y0Brkc5aXQ=4Bkwx_wdSqvcGnkj@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage docbook documentation -> why not asciidoc ? by Mike Frysinger
1 On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Saturday, November 27, 2010 16:39:04 Alec Warner wrote:
3 >> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
4 >> > As it is, I'm fairly comfortable with docbook. Now you want me to learn
5 >> > a new format, with possible drawbacks, in order to try and draw in some
6 >> > contributions that may never happen?
7 >>
8 >> Here is where I would look for data.  Are there pending contributions?
9 >>  I have not seen anyone on this list specifically say "I'd write some
10 >> documentation if it was not in docbook."  I have had issues (years
11 >> ago) getting vapier to write documentation; but I assumed that was
12 >> because he hated writing docs and he contributed documentation after a
13 >> while.
14 >
15 > not sure where you're going with this, but i'm the one who started the doc/
16 > dir and introduced the docbook system.  obviously i have no problem with it
17 > and would rather see real examples of people who are being impeded by it
18 > rather than yet another "omg we need to switch to this awesome new format
19 > because it is so awesome".
20 > -mike
21 >
22
23 Hi Mike,
24
25 at the beginning, I've just made a try and see if it would be
26 feasible, then I decided to suggest the portage team about it, that's
27 all.
28 As I said before, if the majority of relevant people are not
29 interested and want to stay with a docbook source, that's totally
30 fine. I never meant to change habits neither do I pretend that
31 asciidoc is awesome. It was simply a suggestion, in case you did not
32 know it.
33
34 I also understand that it's not good to change formats all the time.If
35 docbook is well established as the reference tool for you to make
36 docs, then please, keep the docbook format and just forget about the
37 discussion.
38
39 As an aside note, that would be a bit more pleasant to read if the
40 current doc had a bit of css styling. Would you be against that ? I am
41 not a designer at all, but I can still suggest a css for docbook,
42 unless some Gentoo project already suggests one.
43
44 Best regards,
45 Lionel