| 1 |
Christian Hoenig wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>>The release of Portage 2.0.51 could be a major news item. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> I don't know if this has been discussed elsewhere or if i missed another |
| 10 |
> statement on this... |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Why is portage using such a strange naming scheme? Why are we only increasing |
| 13 |
> ´build numbers´? As this seems to be a major release, why don´t we make a 2.1 |
| 14 |
> out of it? |
| 15 |
> What are the plans considering the naming scheme? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Too many ´Whys´? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> tell me :-) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
I don't think this is a "major" release as in "major version" but more as in |
| 22 |
"big deal". From what I've heard, a major version change will be reserved for a |
| 23 |
complete rewrite of Portage. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Andrew Gaffney |
| 27 |
Network Administrator |
| 28 |
Skyline Aeronautics, LLC. |
| 29 |
636-357-1548 |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives