Archives
Archives
| From: | Christian Hoenig <list@××××××.cc> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] naming scheme (was: Portage .51 features) | ||
| Date: | Thu, 16 Sep 2004 19:57:07 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200409162157.01875.list@hoenig.cc | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage .51 features by Sven Vermeulen |
||
| 1 | Hi, |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > The release of Portage 2.0.51 could be a major news item. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | I don't know if this has been discussed elsewhere or if i missed another |
| 7 | statement on this... |
| 8 | |
| 9 | Why is portage using such a strange naming scheme? Why are we only increasing |
| 10 | ´build numbers´? As this seems to be a major release, why don´t we make a 2.1 |
| 11 | out of it? |
| 12 | What are the plans considering the naming scheme? |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Too many ´Whys´? |
| 15 | |
| 16 | tell me :-) |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | take care, have fun |
| 20 | /christian |
| 21 | |
| 22 | -- |
| 23 | gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] naming scheme | Andrew Gaffney <agaffney@×××××××××××.com> |