| 1 |
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:10 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> W dniu śro, 10.01.2018 o godzinie 21∶45 -0500, użytkownik Mike Gilbert |
| 3 |
> napisał: |
| 4 |
>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:56 PM, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> > On 01/10/2018 02:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 6 |
>> > > Enable repoman checks on exp profiles by default to improve |
| 7 |
>> > > the dependency graph integrity on those profiles and help them on their |
| 8 |
>> > > way towards stable status. This is possible now that the dependency |
| 9 |
>> > > graph problems are warnings rather than errors. |
| 10 |
>> > > --- |
| 11 |
>> > > repoman/pym/repoman/argparser.py | 2 +- |
| 12 |
>> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) |
| 13 |
>> > > |
| 14 |
>> > > diff --git a/repoman/pym/repoman/argparser.py b/repoman/pym/repoman/argparser.py |
| 15 |
>> > > index f32972288..d49147366 100644 |
| 16 |
>> > > --- a/repoman/pym/repoman/argparser.py |
| 17 |
>> > > +++ b/repoman/pym/repoman/argparser.py |
| 18 |
>> > > @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ def parse_args(argv, qahelp, repoman_default_opts): |
| 19 |
>> > > |
| 20 |
>> > > parser.add_argument( |
| 21 |
>> > > '-e', '--include-exp-profiles', choices=('y', 'n'), metavar='<y|n>', |
| 22 |
>> > > - default=False, |
| 23 |
>> > > + default='y', |
| 24 |
>> > > help='include exp profiles in dependency checks') |
| 25 |
>> > > |
| 26 |
>> > > parser.add_argument( |
| 27 |
>> > > |
| 28 |
>> > |
| 29 |
>> > We have dev and exp profiles disabled by default because the time |
| 30 |
>> > consumed by repoman is proportional to the number of profiles. |
| 31 |
>> > |
| 32 |
>> > The current counts are as follows: |
| 33 |
>> > |
| 34 |
>> > stable 87 |
| 35 |
>> > dev 88 |
| 36 |
>> > exp 149 |
| 37 |
>> |
| 38 |
>> Yeah, I really don't like the idea of making repoman even slower by default. |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> The alternative is to go for all profiles being stable. Because |
| 41 |
> accepting developers randomly breaking profiles 'because repoman speed' |
| 42 |
> is not acceptable. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
I disagree. Many of these are profiles that are seldom used and very |
| 45 |
few users are affected by any breakage. |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
There's a balance to be struck here, and I think it's pretty good |
| 48 |
right where it is. |
Archives