Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] use.force and package.use.force (bug #142853)
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 20:36:08
Message-Id: 44D79EEE.7040604@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] use.force and package.use.force (bug #142853) by Brian Harring
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Brian Harring wrote:
5 > Semantics of USE=-gtk not working on a package that has gtk forced
6 > doesn't sound all that nice btw;
7
8 Which is why the flag shouldn't be forced unless it's almost certain that the flag shouldn't be disabled. The gtk flag might not ever fall into that category, but something like cxx might (nocxx inverted).
9
10 Zac
11 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
12 Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
13
14 iD8DBQFE157t/ejvha5XGaMRAncBAJ9QNHCEUJOFdwsZb40cp5pUqaouYQCfZZR1
15 N/n/XsXWO/gl8Ijw6Q+miXE=
16 =uIuU
17 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
18 --
19 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] use.force and package.use.force (bug #142853) Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>