| 1 |
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 10:01:12AM +0000, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 |
> Zac Medico wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> >Users can unforce them via /etc/portage/profile/{use.force,package.use.force} in the usual "-flag" way. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Why new files? Why isn't this just pushed into the use stacking order |
| 7 |
> over-ridable by the user (default USE flags, and not forcing)? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Then they can over-ride it in package.use just like they do now? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Semantics of USE=-gtk not working on a package that has gtk forced |
| 12 |
doesn't sound all that nice btw; if it's conditional yet the user has |
| 13 |
to disable it via profile files.. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> ---------------- |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Brian, default USE in IUSE is not a backwards compatable change and this |
| 19 |
> is easier ;) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
An EAPI bump is pretty simple from where I'm sitting, and implementing |
| 22 |
it isn't all that hard. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Meanwhile, the question should be "which is desirable", not "which can |
| 25 |
I glue in quickest" ;) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
~harring |
Archives