1 |
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 23:52, Marius Mauch wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:08:00 -0800 |
3 |
> Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > Well, if you disagreed with the original response, continue the |
5 |
> > conversation prior to commiting- otherwise we see a commit, then a |
6 |
> > rebuttal a few hours later. Not really how things should go for a |
7 |
> > contested piece of code (at least when the only two to weigh in our |
8 |
> > flat out opposed on it)- especially if the code's effect is |
9 |
> > nontrivial and it hasn't had any actual peer review (only comment was |
10 |
> > on your algo). |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Interesting, you now count for two people? Or who is this second person |
13 |
> you're talking of? I still think you're making more out of this than it |
14 |
> really is. Also there really isn't a point in discussing a difference in |
15 |
> opinion IMO, such attempts lead nowhere. I considered your comment, but |
16 |
> couldn't come up with a reason why a theoretical issue should hold this |
17 |
> up. |
18 |
|
19 |
Even if Brian can't count, a single (reasonable) voice should be enough to |
20 |
prevent moving forward. That single voice could have said everything that |
21 |
other possible responders were thinking of saying negating the need for |
22 |
further responses. |
23 |
|
24 |
So what's happening with this? As far as I understand it, there's a high |
25 |
probability of incorrect file generation. Should "vdbkeys" be pulled out of |
26 |
emaint's "modules" var until next release? |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Jason Stubbs |
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |