| 1 |
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 07:39:01PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> If the changes are reviewed roughly in proportion to the number of hunks, we |
| 3 |
> should be okay. At minimum, we should at least see how .54 turns out as there |
| 4 |
> will be a few major changes in there already. I kind of expect .54 to do |
| 5 |
> better than .53 actually. |
| 6 |
"roughly in proportion" ? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Reminds me... portage-commits. Alias right now sort of does the job, |
| 9 |
but I want it to be an ml so we don't have to manage adding new people |
| 10 |
in- what was the end result infra wise for that? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Remember also that if we go the 2.1.x route, 2.0.x bugfixes can be pushed out |
| 13 |
> quicker but the fixes all have to be committed twice. I for one am terrible |
| 14 |
> at that. ;) |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
That's why we're using svn, and why merge rules. ;) |
| 17 |
~harring |
Archives