Archives
Archives
| From: | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: sets remove support replacement? | ||
| Date: | Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:24:23 | ||
| Message-Id: | pan.2009.11.19.19.33.58@cox.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] sets remove support replacement? by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | Zac Medico posted on Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:36:28 -0800 as excerpted: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > There's no replacement for it yet, so yes, for now that seems like the |
| 4 | > best option if you need such fine-grained control. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Thanks. Done. =:^) |
| 7 | |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 10 | "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 11 | and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |