1 |
Duncan wrote: |
2 |
> Now remove sets don't work. What are the options? The most direct is to |
3 |
> simply create my own set listing everything I want, but that won't |
4 |
> account for anything added to the sets as they appear upstream over |
5 |
> time. What to do about that? |
6 |
> |
7 |
> I suppose I could create an update script that diffs the new kde-testing |
8 |
> set against a copy I stashed somewhere, thus showing me the differences, |
9 |
> and that I could then update my own set and the stashed copy of the |
10 |
> upstream set accordingly. Is that the best option under the |
11 |
> circumstances, or does portage provide some other replacement for the |
12 |
> functionality I just lost in that regard, with the loss of remove set |
13 |
> functionality? |
14 |
|
15 |
There's no replacement for it yet, so yes, for now that seems like |
16 |
the best option if you need such fine-grained control. |
17 |
-- |
18 |
Thanks, |
19 |
Zac |