Archives
Archives
| From: | Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] ACCEPT_KEYWORDS depreciation | ||
| Date: | Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:42:54 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200512151442.04890.carlo@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] ACCEPT_KEYWORDS depreciation by Marius Mauch |
||
| 1 | On Thursday 15 December 2005 13:05, Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 2 | > package.keywords isn't better or worse than ACCEPT_KEYWORDS, it's just |
| 3 | > different in its behavior. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | I disagree. ACCEPT_KEYWORDS is problematic for (new) users, because of its |
| 6 | behaviour. On the other hand I'm one of these dumb asses as well, using it for |
| 7 | quick testing purposes without having to edit package.keywords constantly - |
| 8 | and I'm not fond of seeing it go at all. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | Carsten |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] ACCEPT_KEYWORDS depreciation | Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> |