| 1 |
On Thursday 28 October 2004 21:55, Wendall Cada wrote: |
| 2 |
> When the switch way made, it was done poorly. |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
How could we have done it better? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
News items were published on www.gentoo.org, in GWN, and in a popular |
| 7 |
magazine. Announcements were posted to Gentoo mailing lists. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
The one thing we do lack is documentation on www.gentoo.org. However, the man |
| 10 |
pages that come with webapp-config are very comprehensive. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> Previous implementations should have been honored. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Not possible, practical, or desirable. Sorry. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> If this is the way of the future, I guess I'm |
| 17 |
> stuck. Else, please consider moving back to making non-structural |
| 18 |
> changes be handled by portage. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
What is it about webapp-config that concerns you? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Best regards, |
| 23 |
Stu |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives