| 1 |
On Sunday 06 November 2005 06:09, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
> We've pretty much ignored the minor, and abused the micro for both bug |
| 3 |
> fixing and feature inclusion. Thoughts on using micro for _strictly_ |
| 4 |
> bug fixes, and macro for features? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I suggested this before, but it didn't go down too well... |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> Yes we'll run aground of the dead 2.1 release (not incredibly happy |
| 9 |
> about that), but I'd like to see if we can get bug fixes out a bit |
| 10 |
> quicker, with some semblence of a gurantee we're not tagging in stuff |
| 11 |
> an admin isn't going to care about. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
What sort of bug fixes are you looking to get out quicker? While the EAPI |
| 14 |
stuff drew out .53 a little longer than originally expected it was still only |
| 15 |
30 days from first rc to final (assuming _rc7 is final). I can't really see |
| 16 |
the necessity for getting non-regression fixes out "quicker". At the moment, |
| 17 |
a lot of fixes go out all at once rather than in lots of small bumps. I doubt |
| 18 |
the overall speed would change very much. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Jason Stubbs |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives