| 1 |
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 10:31:59 -0500 |
| 2 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 00:01 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Hi all, |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > I don't think there's really anything else that can be done for |
| 8 |
> > 2.0.53 so am thinking that we should probably push _rc7 + docs out |
| 9 |
> > and let the arch teams mark it stable when they're ready (or stick |
| 10 |
> > with 2.0.51.22-r3 if it pleaseth them). |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> [snip] |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> > There's a few things listed on the new |
| 15 |
> > (still unreleased?) project index and I'm looking to get the |
| 16 |
> > dependency stuff refactored and moved out of emerge.. What are the |
| 17 |
> > shortterm goals? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> For me my short term goals are to see these things happen |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> * post_sync action hook (.53/.54 ) |
| 22 |
> * pax-utils depends ( .53 ) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
If we use it we have to dep on it, so not really a feature by itself. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> * new prepstrip offering splitdebug ( .53/.54 ) |
| 27 |
> * misc cleanups of dyn_install (.54 ) |
| 28 |
> * seeing CDPEND stop being created for the VDB ( .53 ) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Yeah, CDEPEND has to die (although it technically never lived) |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
> * flattened vdb {P,R,}DEPEND (.54 ) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
See Jasons mail. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
> * introduction of RRDEPEND to the VDB ( .54 ) |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Rename it to LDEPEND and it's ok (no reverse deps here, just forward |
| 39 |
link level deps) |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
> * VDB prevention of single byte NULL entries being created. ( .54 ) |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
Not sure what this means. Just prevention of empty files in vdb? |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
Marius |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
-- |
| 48 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 51 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
Archives