Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] .53, .54 and beyond...
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 15:32:42
Message-Id: 1132932719.5317.58.camel@localhost
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] .53, .54 and beyond... by Jason Stubbs
1 On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 00:01 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
2 > Hi all,
3 >
4 > I don't think there's really anything else that can be done for 2.0.53 so am
5 > thinking that we should probably push _rc7 + docs out and let the arch teams
6 > mark it stable when they're ready (or stick with 2.0.51.22-r3 if it pleaseth
7 > them).
8
9 [snip]
10
11 > There's a few things listed on the new
12 > (still unreleased?) project index and I'm looking to get the dependency stuff
13 > refactored and moved out of emerge.. What are the shortterm goals?
14
15 For me my short term goals are to see these things happen
16
17 * post_sync action hook (.53/.54 )
18 * pax-utils depends ( .53 )
19 * new prepstrip offering splitdebug ( .53/.54 )
20 * misc cleanups of dyn_install (.54 )
21 * seeing CDPEND stop being created for the VDB ( .53 )
22 * flattened vdb {P,R,}DEPEND (.54 )
23 * introduction of RRDEPEND to the VDB ( .54 )
24 * VDB prevention of single byte NULL entries being created. ( .54 )
25
26
27 --
28 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
29 Gentoo Linux
30
31 --
32 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] .53, .54 and beyond... Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] .53, .54 and beyond... Marius Mauch <genone@g.o>