1 |
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:42:50 +0300 |
2 |
Ali Polatel <31415926j@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Hi everyone, |
5 |
> I wonder if GPG support for mod_mail would be useful.I wrote some |
6 |
> basic code that works.The user is required to export his public key |
7 |
> and put the path to PORTAGE_ELOG_MAILGPG. |
8 |
> Attached is the patch for mod_mail.py.It won't work with armored |
9 |
> key files because gpg can't directly encrypt messages with ascii |
10 |
> armored keys , they need to be --dearmor'ed first. |
11 |
> Thoughts? |
12 |
|
13 |
Well, I don't really see a reason why one would want to encrypt those |
14 |
mails. The only potentially sensitive information (package |
15 |
name/version) is already contained in the subject and therefore |
16 |
wouldn't be encrypted. And gpg support can be a bitch to maintain, so |
17 |
I'd like to see the benefit before adding that feature. |
18 |
|
19 |
Marius |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
23 |
|
24 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
25 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
26 |
-- |
27 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |