1 |
On 6/30/20 10:29 AM, Sid Spry wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 9:34 PM, Zac Medico wrote: |
3 |
>> On 6/29/20 7:15 PM, Sid Spry wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 9:13 PM, Sid Spry wrote: |
5 |
>>>> Hello, |
6 |
>>>> |
7 |
>>>> I have some runnable pseudocode outlining a faster tree verification algorithm. |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>> Ah, right. It's worth noting that even faster than this algorithm is simply verifying |
10 |
>>> a .tar.xz. Is that totally off the table? I realize it doesn't fit every usecase, but it |
11 |
>>> seems to be faster in both sync and verification time. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> We've already got support for that with sync-type = webrsync. However, I |
14 |
>> imagine sync-type = git is even better. All of the types are covered here: |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Portage_Security |
17 |
> |
18 |
> I'm being warned right now that webrsync-gpg is being deprecated; I've been using |
19 |
> it. It is, amazingly, faster than a typical rsync and may be faster than a git pull though. |
20 |
|
21 |
Yeah webrsync-gpg is deprecated but the replacement is sync-type = |
22 |
webrsync and verification is enabled by default for that sync-type. |
23 |
-- |
24 |
Thanks, |
25 |
Zac |