Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Initial fetch() refactoring
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 22:46:38
Message-Id: CAAr7Pr9giEqB=fU_kzCDsnf9G3toA5de3RZ=BhH2JueCN9UQOw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Initial fetch() refactoring by Alexander Berntsen
1 On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Alexander Berntsen <alexander@××××××.net>wrote:
2
3 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
4 > Hash: SHA256
5 >
6 > On 19/01/14 22:22, Sebastian Luther wrote:
7 > > The usual doc string style used in portage is:
8 > >
9 > > """ text """
10 > >
11 > > Please use that for new functions. Also make sure you don't use
12 > > spaces to indent the last """.
13 > >
14 > As mentioned by Mike in another thread, we should use PEP 257[0]. I
15 > will convert old code to conform to this... sometime... soon... (I
16 > promise!)
17 >
18 > So if new patches could just do that right away, that would be neat.
19 >
20
21 Does pylint or pyflakes point out if you mess it up?
22
23 Automation for the win.
24
25 -A
26
27
28 >
29 > [0] <http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0257/>
30 > - --
31 > Alexander
32 > alexander@××××××.net
33 > http://plaimi.net/~alexander
34 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
35 > Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
36 > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
37 >
38 > iF4EAREIAAYFAlLcVaAACgkQRtClrXBQc7XjTwD/UsCQo+SJdiCX/QsMC8jFDPic
39 > k0jEAN6DA5xML6/nJYQA/36FszMfVMZ/vzg5VF9FS6BDWwGm/Qy2whyqLiF3FOrX
40 > =+5Yy
41 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
42 >
43 >

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Initial fetch() refactoring Alexander Berntsen <alexander@××××××.net>
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Initial fetch() refactoring "W. Trevor King" <wking@×××××××.us>
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/3] Initial fetch() refactoring Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>