1 |
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 04:01:54PM -0700, m h wrote: |
2 |
> On 10/5/05, Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 02:52:59PM -0700, m h wrote: |
4 |
> > > Hmmm, I'm not clear yet on the value of interdomain, but I'm sure |
5 |
> > > someone will enlighten me along the way... |
6 |
> > interdomain would be how ciaran's HOME request would be pulled off; |
7 |
> > user's 'domain', configuration settings + prefix offset would try to |
8 |
> > satisfy deps from the global domain '/'. When it can't, would resort |
9 |
> > to installing to the user's domain, assuming the ebuild is capable of |
10 |
> > it. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > > OK, so since I have a deadline (end of next week) I'd like to have a |
13 |
> > > simple prototype working. IE me running apache on FC4 with portage. |
14 |
> > > If I can do that then it's very likely that I'll be able to devote a |
15 |
> > > bit of time towards working on this (where this could be rewrite) (bug |
16 |
> > > fixes, polishing it up, unittests, etc). On that note, I need to know |
17 |
> > > what the timeframe for rewrite is. If it's to a state where I can |
18 |
> > > work with it then maybe I should try and start from there. But I'm |
19 |
> > > assumming it will be easier/quicker to get haubi's stuff working. |
20 |
> > Haubi's is what I'd recommend. |
21 |
> > Rewrite isn't anywhere near that sort of timeline. |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Great, so on that note, since Haubi's work is based on portage 2.1, |
25 |
> can anyone point me to the cvs repository? (Or are they all moved to |
26 |
> svn?) |
27 |
svn co svn://twobit.net/portage/main/trunk # <-- 2.1 branch |
28 |
~harring |