Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions about CVS locations and GID...
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 23:11:47
Message-Id: 20051005231051.GC13519@nightcrawler
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Questions about CVS locations and GID... by m h
1 On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 04:01:54PM -0700, m h wrote:
2 > On 10/5/05, Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o> wrote:
3 > > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 02:52:59PM -0700, m h wrote:
4 > > > Hmmm, I'm not clear yet on the value of interdomain, but I'm sure
5 > > > someone will enlighten me along the way...
6 > > interdomain would be how ciaran's HOME request would be pulled off;
7 > > user's 'domain', configuration settings + prefix offset would try to
8 > > satisfy deps from the global domain '/'. When it can't, would resort
9 > > to installing to the user's domain, assuming the ebuild is capable of
10 > > it.
11 > >
12 > > > OK, so since I have a deadline (end of next week) I'd like to have a
13 > > > simple prototype working. IE me running apache on FC4 with portage.
14 > > > If I can do that then it's very likely that I'll be able to devote a
15 > > > bit of time towards working on this (where this could be rewrite) (bug
16 > > > fixes, polishing it up, unittests, etc). On that note, I need to know
17 > > > what the timeframe for rewrite is. If it's to a state where I can
18 > > > work with it then maybe I should try and start from there. But I'm
19 > > > assumming it will be easier/quicker to get haubi's stuff working.
20 > > Haubi's is what I'd recommend.
21 > > Rewrite isn't anywhere near that sort of timeline.
22 > >
23 >
24 > Great, so on that note, since Haubi's work is based on portage 2.1,
25 > can anyone point me to the cvs repository? (Or are they all moved to
26 > svn?)
27 svn co svn://twobit.net/portage/main/trunk # <-- 2.1 branch
28 ~harring