Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: tvali <qtvali@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Few things, which imho would make portage better
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:52:57
Message-Id: cea53e3c0603140652u2d089b72x@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Few things, which imho would make portage better by Marius Mauch
1 > You're talking about the cache, take a look at the cache subsystem and
2 > write a mysql module for it. This will never become a default though (we
3 > would get killed if portage starts to depend on mysql).
4
5 I think that it should not become default as mysql module, but if it
6 is working, it should become default as "portable" sql module.
7
8 # emerge sqlite pysqlite
9
10 I havent used sqlite, but it seems to be small and usable. I think
11 that it should start with it.
12
13 I think that portage should *support* sql by default, but of course it
14 should not be default before it's clear that many people like it and
15 use it. What is imho more important is how to make one usable
16 interface, which would cover both fs and sql portage db's so that
17 development didnt go into two products.
18
19 --
20 tvali
21 (e-mail: "qtvali@×××××.com"; msn: "qtvali@×××××.com";
22 icq: "317-492-912")
23
24 Ühe eesti internetifirma lehel kohtasin tsitaati:
25 If you don't do it excellently, dont do it at all. Because if it's not
26 excellent, it won't be profitable or fun, and if you're not in
27 business for fun or profit, what the hell are you doing here?
28 Robert Townsend
29
30 --
31 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies