| 1 |
El jue, 25-07-2013 a las 12:00 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: |
| 2 |
> On 07/25/2013 11:54 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 3 |
> > This question comes to my mind every time a developer decides to |
| 4 |
> > drop/add a USE flag to ebuilds like gcc/webkit-gtk/libreoffice... |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > I think that we should have a file (like used for category movements) to |
| 7 |
> > let PM know how to handle this situation. |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > For example, |
| 10 |
> > category/foo-1.0 has a "gnome" USE flag but, later, that one is dropped: |
| 11 |
> > -> If it is now *enabling* that support always, our file could have |
| 12 |
> > something like: |
| 13 |
> > category/foo gnome + -> that would mean that, when "gnome" USE flag is |
| 14 |
> > NOT found, portage assumes it as being enabled, that will mean that |
| 15 |
> > people having previously "gnome" enabled wouldn't need to rebuild the |
| 16 |
> > package |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > ... and the opposite |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > What do you think? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> We could do something like that. You should propose it in the gentoo-pms |
| 23 |
> list. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
OK, wanted to be sure a similar idea wasn't rejected before :) |
Archives