| 1 |
On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 13:46 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
|
| 2 |
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:45:48 +0000 |
| 3 |
> Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 00:41 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > On 11/27/2015 12:24 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > > On a related note, could not profile-formats = portage-2 profile-set |
| 8 |
> > > > become default ? |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > For purposes of interoperability, we use PMS to document the standard |
| 11 |
> > > profile format. So, in order to change the default profile format as you |
| 12 |
> > > suggest, we would have to change PMS retroactively. Generally, |
| 13 |
> > > retroactive changes to PMS need to be very well justified in order to be |
| 14 |
> > > accepted. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > hmm, how about in gentoo layout.conf? |
| 17 |
> > There seems to be additions there so perhaps one can add |
| 18 |
> > profile-formats = portage-2 profile-set ? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> This will break the two alternative package managers as profile-set is |
| 21 |
> only implemented in Portage. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
What about:
|
| 24 |
# Use thin Manifests for Git
|
| 25 |
thin-manifests = false
|
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
# Sign Git commits, and NOT Manifests
|
| 28 |
sign-commits = false
|
| 29 |
sign-manifests = false
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Are these not fairly new too? How could these enter the gentoo repo?
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
What about adding portage-2 now and announce profile-set to be added soon?
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Jocke |
Archives