| 1 |
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:45:48 +0000 |
| 2 |
Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 00:41 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On 11/27/2015 12:24 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > On a related note, could not profile-formats = portage-2 profile-set |
| 7 |
> > > become default ? |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > For purposes of interoperability, we use PMS to document the standard |
| 10 |
> > profile format. So, in order to change the default profile format as you |
| 11 |
> > suggest, we would have to change PMS retroactively. Generally, |
| 12 |
> > retroactive changes to PMS need to be very well justified in order to be |
| 13 |
> > accepted. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> hmm, how about in gentoo layout.conf? |
| 16 |
> There seems to be additions there so perhaps one can add |
| 17 |
> profile-formats = portage-2 profile-set ? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
This will break the two alternative package managers as profile-set is |
| 20 |
only implemented in Portage. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Best regards, |
| 24 |
Michał Górny |
| 25 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives