| 1 |
On 6/16/20 11:43 AM, michael.lienhardt wrote: |
| 2 |
> Dear all, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> My bad for not noticing it sooner, but when there is a dependency like |
| 5 |
> ">=sys-fs/udev-208-r1:0/0[static-libs?]" (that occurs in |
| 6 |
> virtual/libgudev-215-r3), since 'static-libs' is not a use flags of |
| 7 |
> sys-fs/udev-242, it is silently not considered during dependency solving |
| 8 |
> by emerge. |
| 9 |
> However, the PMS states: |
| 10 |
> - it is an error for a use dependency to be applied to an ebuild which |
| 11 |
> does not have the flag in question in IUSE_REFERENCEABLE |
| 12 |
> - For EAPIs listed in table 5.4 |
| 13 |
> <https://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/head/pms.html#x1-56001r4> as not |
| 14 |
> supporting profile defined IUSE injection, IUSE_REFERENCEABLE is equal |
| 15 |
> to the calculated IUSE value. For EAPIs where profile defined IUSE |
| 16 |
> injection is supported, IUSE_REFERENCEABLE is equal to IUSE_EFFECTIVE |
| 17 |
> And 'static-libs' is not in the IUSE_EFFECTIVE of sys-fs/udev-242 (that |
| 18 |
> ebuild has EAPI=6). |
| 19 |
> So it seems to me that this current behavior of emerge should be |
| 20 |
> considered an error, no? Or the PMS should be updated? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
It's valid as a 4-style dependency with use-dep-defaults. |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Thanks, |
| 25 |
Zac |
Archives