| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Simon Stelling wrote: |
| 5 |
> Zac Medico wrote: |
| 6 |
>> What do people think about adding userpriv and usersandox to |
| 7 |
>> make.globals FEATURES? I've been using these for a long time and |
| 8 |
>> haven't had any trouble with them. Are there any arguments against |
| 9 |
>> making them default? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I didn't verify this personally, but a few days ago mkay came to |
| 12 |
> #g-portage and asked whether FEATURES='usersandbox -sandbox' resulting |
| 13 |
> in sandbox enabled is expected behaviour or not. Before we add |
| 14 |
> usersandbox to the default FEATURES we should make sure that -sandbox |
| 15 |
> always disables sandbox. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Yeah, we should fix that. In fact, usersandbox seems like a redundant feature to me. Can we deprecate usersandbox and recommend "sandbox" as the sole means of toggling sandbox on and off (whether userpriv is enabled or not)? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Zac |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 22 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
iD8DBQFEOrHs/ejvha5XGaMRApNiAKCUkza2rTSmG0d51OlUsEN++xexaACeNKnl |
| 25 |
X03PHolSFdQzrV7iglO70Pg= |
| 26 |
=9QWG |
| 27 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives